You are here
Scrap JLSC, appoint new body
The Judicial and Legal Service Commission (JLSC) should be replaced with a more independent and transparent body.
This is the main recommendation made by the seven-member committee appointed by the Law Association to review the recruitment process for judges, magistrates and other legal officers employed by the State, such as the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Solicitor General Department and Chief Solicitor’s Department.
The committee, chaired by former Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) Judge Desiree Bernard, yesterday presented its 67-page report on the issue to the Council of the Law Association at its office in Port-of-Spain.
According to the report, the committee recommended replacing the JLSC, which currently recruits and disciplines judges, magistrates and all State attorneys at Government ministries and agencies, with a new Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC).
While the JLSC currently comprises of the Chief Justice (CJ), the head of the Public Service Commission (PSC), a retired Appellate Judge and two persons with legal qualifications, the committee suggested that the JAC comprise of seven members. All the members except the CJ and the head of the PSC are currently selected by the President.
The seven members suggested are the CJ, a retired Court of Appeal Judge, a senior attorney nominated by the Law Association, an attorney selected by the President, a human resource professional and two outstanding members of civil society, who would be selected by the President after consultation with the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition.
Addressing members of the media at the event, Law Association President Douglas Mendes, SC, suggested that such a body would ensure that process is more democratic.
He said: “It is to expose the process to different voices and perspectives that the commission is not automatically exposed to now.”
Also speaking at the event, committee member Terrence Farrell stated that one of the most keenly debated recommendations was whether the CJ should remain as head of the body.
Farrell explained that they decided that the CJ should remain in place but that the new body should only focus on judges and magistrates as opposed to thousands of State attorneys as well.
Apart from replacing the JLSC, the committee also recommended that the new body should publish the eligibility criteria and the process of selection as there are no extensive official publications on the issues, currently.
Other major recommendations in the report include increasing the retirement age for judges from 65 to 70 and to allow judges to return to private practice after five years after resignation or retirement. Currently, the time period for doing so is 10 years.
“By extending the retirement age to 70, it would allow practitioners, who have met their financial obligations and are willing to give up a very lucrative practice, to enjoy what may be a ten year period on the bench,” Mendes said.
The report is now expected to be discussed by the association’s council, which would then decide whether to accept the recommendations or make amendments. The report will then be disseminated to the association’s members and members of the public. The association is expected to hold public consultations on the recommendations before it moves on to recommending that Parliament implement them.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.