You are here
CJ should only be questioned by a proper authority
The current CJ issue, innocently begun, has now resulted in a downward spiral into legal anarchy. Contrary to my opinion, the CJ has responded to one of the allegations which appears to have been fake news. But what of the libel, slander and public mischief associated with such news?
The judges are now appropriately silent on the issue, but will they apologise?
The legal fraternity continues to be overwhelmed by the situation and seem to be dysfunctional. Mr Seunath SC, also suggested, wrongly in my opinion, that the impeachment panel, if the matter got that far, would have to be screened like a common jury. But the President, whose duty it is to appoint such a panel, is not constrained to appoint members from a list of jurors.
In the meantime the CJ should refuse to answer any of the allegations until questioned by the proper authority.
LENNIE M NIMBLETT,
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.